4.3.1.5 Rat Fluoxetine VS Control for NoStressed in Dentate Gyrus

This section corresponds to the fourth meta-analysis requested by El Chérif.

Table 4.5: Mapping between ids and designs used in the integration plots below
id design
1-GSE42940 GSE42940-FluoxetineVsControl
2-SRP056481 SRP056481-FluoxetineVsMethylcellulose
Alphabetically-sorted genes significant in at least one comparison (padj < 0.05). + and – signs highlight respectively upregulated and downregulated genes (|logFoldChange| > 0.1 and raw pvalue < 0.05).

Figure 4.87: Alphabetically-sorted genes significant in at least one comparison (padj < 0.05). + and – signs highlight respectively upregulated and downregulated genes (|logFoldChange| > 0.1 and raw pvalue < 0.05).

Consensus-sorted genes significant in at least one comparison (padj < 0.05). + and – signs highlight respectively upregulated and downregulated genes (|logFoldChange| > 0.1 and raw pvalue < 0.05).

Figure 4.88: Consensus-sorted genes significant in at least one comparison (padj < 0.05). + and – signs highlight respectively upregulated and downregulated genes (|logFoldChange| > 0.1 and raw pvalue < 0.05).

Consensus-sorted genes significant in at least one comparison (padj < 0.0001). + and – signs highlight respectively upregulated and downregulated genes (|logFoldChange| > 0.1 and raw pvalue < 0.05). Underlying table is available [here](xlsx/resultsIntegrationRatFluoxetineVsControlNoStressedConsensusPadj0p0001.xlsx)

Figure 4.89: Consensus-sorted genes significant in at least one comparison (padj < 0.0001). + and – signs highlight respectively upregulated and downregulated genes (|logFoldChange| > 0.1 and raw pvalue < 0.05). Underlying table is available here